Monday, November 21, 2016

Data Central:
How Overstock Leads by Detecting Needs

As the holidays approach, many consumers turn to online shopping for inventory that is rarely out of stock, favorable pricing, and the convenience of home delivery. Considering Overstock.com’s longevity and e-commerce success, it is an ideal subject to study in terms of web analytics and search engine optimization.


Monday, November 14, 2016

Whatagraph Paints a Picture of
Google Analytics Data










Google Analytics (GA) analyzes traffic to approximately 55% of websites around the world. Dozens of other web-metrics solutions are attempting to chip away at its market share; still, Google Analytics’ closest competitor claims its technology is used by only 5% of global websites (W3Techs, 2016).

Some Challenges. The popularity of Google Analytics may be owed to the fact that it produces a wealth of powerful insights at a bargain price – $0. Alas, the technology’s robust set of features is also its undoing for some users. The following remark sums up that sentiment (Karr, 2016).

“Let’s face it, Google Analytics is a mess for the average business…As an agency, we are not the average business, but even we have issues dissecting the data at times.”

Yes, GA is fairly difficult to learn, never mind to master. It requires an investment of time and mental energy. In a dynamic industry driven by deadlines, both can be hard to come by. Under-utilized or inactive GA accounts in marketing departments are not that uncommon. Fortunately, a variety of free apps ease the pain.

Monday, November 7, 2016

I Googled "Alternatives to Google Analytics"
and Discovered Piwik

Website metrics tools enable organizations to understand their audiences’ online experiences, and leverage insights to achieve strategic goals.

Google Analytics is the towering giant in the web-measurement-technology space, dwarfing all global competitors. Even so, a dynamic marketplace is teeming with solutions, both established and emerging, some claiming new customers while others struggle for relevance.

Monday, October 31, 2016

How General Electric Uses Social Media to Demystify Giant Machines

When considering companies that have built a successful social media presence, several familiar consumer brands come to mind: Red Bull, Airbnb, Nike, Coca-Cola, GoPro….

But 100+ year-old manufacturing giant General Electric? There’s a company that doesn’t scream “social.” Yet remarkably, GE has taken social media to new heights by publishing high quality content on multiple channels. And, the plot thickens. In mid 2016, GE sold its consumer appliance division (Hudspeth, 2016). So now it concentrates its marketing resources fully on industrial manufacturing, not the most dazzling subject matter. Or is it?


Household products like washing machines, refrigerators, ranges, etc. are out of the picture. Taking center stage are power plants, turbines, aviation engines, locomotives, healthcare equipment, generators, and other products/systems in the company’s vast business-to-business portfolio.

Yes, GE’s product line is a bit atypical for social media.

What social media platforms does the mega B2B corporation use? 
General Electric is currently most active on:
Facebook – 1.7 million followers
LinkedIn – 1.3 million followers
Twitter – 428,000 followers
Instagram – 256,000 followers
YouTube – 97,000 subscribers
Pinterest – 27,000 followers
Periscope – 6,500 followers

An Example. In August, a General Electric team entered an active Nicaraguan volcano, live on social media. The team proceeded to install sensors to monitor volcanic activity. GE set up an early-warning system for the surrounding area. Videos of the descent into the volcano were stitched together via Instagram Stories and promoted on Snapchat (Heine, 2016).

What might be behind GE’s choices of channels and activity? 
With 2015 sales topping $117 billion in 2015, an increase of 21% over the prior year, GE dominates industrial manufacturing worldwide (Hudspeth, 2016).

(Image: Hoovers)

It makes sense that a company at the top of its game would want to lead in marketing, too. GE’s mix of social channels enable it to reach businesses and consumers with a diverse assortment of copy, images, videos, music, sounds, animations, etc. A lagging ROI on a few other social media platforms – Google+, Vine, Tapestry – may have caused GE to leave them behind.

Oh, the humanity. Web analytics authority, Avinash Kaushik’s, notes that B2B companies should resist seeing business audiences as monolithic, robotic decision makers. “As a B2B company, you are still trying to sell to other human beings” (Kaushik, 2010). GE actually does that pretty well. An enormous wind turbine is more than a spinning abstraction on the horizon; it is a sustainable, life-giving force in all its curving, glittering power.

Like any good conversationalist, GE wants to engage people meaningfully, and also be a good listener. GE’s Chief Marketing Officer, Beth Comstock, echoes Kaushik’s argument, saying, “Since when does B2B have to be boring-to-boring? Business people are people, too.” Ms. Comstock says that the company uses what she calls “micro-targeting” to share the wonders of science with customers (Neisser, 2015).

Conversing with Content. General Electric may gravitate towards a traditional “Content is King” model, reliably producing gorgeous, stimulating content. “Without content, there is not a whole lot to talk about,” proclaims loyalty-program marketer Michael Greenberg (2009). But, as Catherine Novak (2010) warns, “Content without conversation is just broadcasting, or just advertising.” GE’s content contains plenty of wows with the intention they be shared, but it walks the edge.

This tweet is impressive. GE’s advanced technology enables an airplane engine to be built from 11 printed parts, instead of usual 845. The tweet points to newsletter content.


You talking to me? General Electric’s social media posts target countless audience segments: governments, businesses, non-profit buyers; stockholders; current and future employees; research universities and their students; merger partners; strategic collaborators, etc. Seeing that GE makes more than half of its revenue by reaching across markets in 100 countries, being a good corporate citizen is important, too. The effective use of social media may help humanize GE in communities around the world and bolster good will (Hudspeth, 2016).

At a minimum, General Electric must maintain its authoritative presence on the same social channels as its primary competitor. Siemens, Europe’s largest industrial manufacturer, is on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. If anything, Siemens has a long way to go to catch GE on social media. Since Siemens’s content sticks to familiar conventions, GE stands out by comparison

Here’s a humanize-the-brand video Siemens published on YouTube.



And this is one of my favorite videos on GE’s YouTube account.



Affinities. I may have a special fondness for the GE video because several of the sounds were recorded at a GE site in Niskayuna/Schenectady, NY where I live. (Schenectady is the home of Thomas Edison, founder of General Electric.) Here are the audio files on GE’s SoundCloud account, if you are curious. And another video, Over 2 Million Containers, 2,000 Routes, is a memorable homage to GE’s transport equipment and logistics systems. This production is so strange, beautiful and assured, it veers into the realm of art.

If the target audience for these two GE videos is young adult males, the content may perform double duty: elevating GE as an innovative maker of cool things, and also acting as a talent-recruitment tool. Judging from a couple of the comments on the 2-Million video, it may have resonated as intended.

“…Amazing, critical thinking and imaginative ideas. GE=awesome.

“That's what I want to do when I grow up”

A statement submitted by marketers with GE’s entry to the annual Shorty Awards competition contains clues about their social media approach (the bolds are mine).

“For GE, social media success isn’t measured in sales, but rather in awareness and affinity. As GE works to gain visibility as a connected and competitive technology leader with advanced research capabilities, the brand turns to both established and emerging social media channels to deliver its message.”

Here are a few other key points interpreted from the Shorty Awards statement (Shorty Awards, 2014).

Goal: Position GE as a “thought leader[s] in advanced technology” emphasizing humanity and relevance to consumers.

Rationale: A technology leader must leverage leading social technologies.

Marketing Strategy: Champion science and celebrate innovations.

Tactic: Distribute engaging, visually striking, sharable narratives on social media.

By embracing the challenge of presenting inaccessible industrial products in bold, captivating ways, GE is engineering something different: its own social-media genre. 

References

Greenberg, M. (2009, October 20). Content is king of social marketing. MultichannelMerchant.com. Retrieved April 12, 2012 from http://multichannelmerchant.com/social-media/1020-content-social-marketing/

Heine, C. (2016, August 3). General Electric is using Instagram Stories to promote its Snapchat series about volcanoes. Adweek. Retrieved from http://www.adweek.com/news/technology/general-electric-using-instagram-stories-promote-its-snapchat-series-about-volcanoes-172791

Hudspeth, C. General Electric Company: Financial Summary. Hoovers. Retrieved from http://subscriber.hoovers.com.www.libproxy.wvu.edu/H/company360/financialSummary.html?companyId=10634000000000&newsCompanyDuns=001367960

Kaushik, A. (2010). Web analytics 2.0: The art of online accountability & science of customer centricity. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.

Neisser, D. (2015, April 2). CMO of the Week: Beth Comstock, General Electric and Spinning Curiosity into B2B Marketing Gold. Social Media Today. Retrieved from http://www.socialmediatoday.com/special-columns/2015-04-02/cmo-week-beth-comstock-general-electric-and-spinning-curiosity-b2b

Novak, C. (2010, July 27). Why conversation, not content, is king. SocialMediaToday.com. Retrieved April 12, 2012 from http://socialmediatoday.com/wordspring/152636/why-conversation-not-content-king

Shorty Awards. (2014). The 6th Annual Shorty Awards: GE on social. Retrieved from http://shortyawards.com/6th/ge-on-social#/

Monday, October 24, 2016

Land of the Landing Page

The Web Analytics Association (2008) defines a landing page as “a page view intended to identify the beginning of the user experience resulting from a defined marketing effort.” It is the destination on which a visitor “lands” after clicking on an organic/paid search result, ad, link in an email campaign, etc. Landing page views are counted and reported through a tool such as Google Analytics.

The landing page metric is classified as a visit characterization. Visit characterization metrics enable marketers to study the behavior of visitors and determine ways to improve their online experience (Web Analytics Association, 2008).

The Skinny on Micro Conversions. Views and subsequent actions performed via the landing page (say, downloading a coupon) are often micro conversions that marketers have specified. Businesses track micro conversions to try to understand where customers are on the road to conversion. According to Google (2013), a micro conversion is “an important action but does not immediately contribute to your bottom line. It’s usually an indicator that a user is moving toward a macro conversion.” Landing page views contribute toward website goals, a business’s KPIs, and overall business objectives.

Example. Here is an email sent by CVS. Each call to action points to a designated landing page.

(Image Credit: CVS)

And below is one of the landing pages. It echoes CVS’s traditional website but foregrounds the deal. As you can see, the landing page presents additional calls to action (customer profile set-up, more specials). Marketers are clearly interested in knowing whether the email triggered landing page views – and other features on the landing page help generate more sales and promote customer loyalty, too. A clue that landing page metrics are being utilized to deliver insights is the tracking code: https://www.cvs.com/weeklyad/browse/browse-home.jsp?WT.mc_id=EM_ECE_102316_CAPS&stop_mobi=yes&eval=Q6J8OpfyNalte4dGmApCFJ0mB8YwkyikEVm81kMI_U2mfaeC2pyC9wDrE82WWvX_#Detail/41414


(Credit: CVS)

If a landing page is under-performing, CVS marketers might choose to tweak and test alternatives to improve results. Optimization tactics might include removing extraneous calls to action and simplifying the design. Of course with its legendary record of success, CVS’s efforts are a case study in marketing effectiveness. That said, a discussion of other landing-page design considerations (with examples), courtesy of Kissmetrics, could be helpful to readers (Chapman, 2011).

The Landing Page Has…Landed. Consider that marketing initiatives drive people to landing pages deep inside a business’s website, many for the first time. Therefore, first-time visitors’ favorable impressions are vital. Some experts, including web analytics guru Avinash Kaushik, contend that “home pages are dead” and entry pages (by loose extension, landing pages) act as home pages (Kaushik, 2010). As such, it is all the more important to align landing page content with the expectations set by marketing messages. Visitors who see value may stick around for more, or at least be receptive to the next marketing message.

They came. They clicked. Then what? As noted in the CVS example, monitoring landing page views and other activity helps marketers evaluate the effectiveness of their efforts, and take steps to improve a page’s performance. For example, if an unexpectedly large number of people click on a paid ad, arrive on the landing page and leave immediately, this could indicate the content does not deliver on the ad’s proposition. To improve landing-page views, variations of ad messages could be tested. By contrast, a well-performing ad and landing page could offer lessons to under-performers.

A large proportion of bounces could also indicate that the problem is not an ad-landing page mismatch, but with the perceived value or design of landing-page content presented to the visitor. Again, marketers might choose to enhance the content of landing pages, and test to see whether that improves things. Exploring templates at Unbounce and other providers can be a good way to become acquainted with landing-page elements.

(Credit: Unbounce.com)


Landing pages typically focus the customer on a message and an action. Measuring landing page views enables marketers to quickly take the pulse of multiple campaigns.

References

Chapman, C. (January 2011). Beginner’s guide to landing pages. Kissmetrics Blog. Retrieved from https://blog.kissmetrics.com/beginners-guide-to-landing-pages/

Google Analytics. (2013, October 7). Digital Analytics Fundamentals: Lesson 2.3 [video]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/xLJt5A-NeQI

Kaushik, A. (2010). Web analytics 2.0: The art of online accountability & science of customer centricity. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.

Web Analytics Association. (2008, September 22). Web analytics definitions. Retrieved from: http://www.digitalanalyticsassociation.org/Files/PDF_standards/WebAnalyticsDefinitions.pdf

More Unique Visitors Please

Most people grasp the concept of unique visitors to a website. The official definition is  “the number of inferred individual people (filtered for spiders and robots), within a designated reporting timeframe, with activity consisting of one or more visits to a site. Each individual is counted only once” (Web Analytics Association, 2008). Actually, persistent cookie IDs of visitors are counted. Avinash Kaushik (2010) calls the unique visitor metric “a superior approximation of the number of people visiting your website.”

The term “unique visitor” is what’s known as a foundational metric. Other basic building blocks of analytic reporting are pages, page views, visits (sessions), and events. If one is unfamiliar with a business, a glance at the counts and trends of foundational metrics provides a simple overview of a business’s online presence. In Google Analytics, unique visitors are known as “users.” (Schwartz, 2014).

(Credit: B.Schwartz)

Why Measure Unique Visitors? Although the number of unique visitors may ebb and flow, an upward trend is typically what businesses want to see. More unique visitors, qualified through search, advertising, marketing or social referral, translates into more potential for conversion. Hopefully, a portion this audience takes action that contributes to KPIs.

Spikes in unique visitors may indicate that discrete marketing efforts are working. A persistent dip in unique visitors could indicate a need to re-test and adjust marketing messages. Perhaps more resources should be dedicated to relevant, high-value content to retain unique visitors and cultivate their loyalty. A number of other factors could swell or shrink the number of unique visitors.

For example, a period of unusually warm weather in the Northeastern U.S. might send people outdoors for recreation, and away from their computers. Shopping seasonality could have an impact, as well. For example, the holidays and a marketing promotion converged on Cyber Monday last year, and masses of unique visitors crashed Target’s website (Wright, 2015).

(Credit: International Business Times)

Evaluating historical, unique-visitor volumes with an analytics tool could help marketers and IT anticipate issues and collaborate on solutions. In fact, Kaushik (2010) recommends retaining unique-visitor and other data for at least a year because of seasonality.

Unique-Visitor Subsets. Segmentation can reveal the composition of unique website visitors, how they are being referred, and what they are seeking. Google Analytics can also display visitor demographics and interests, collecting information from from unique visitors via DoubleClick, Android app activity, and iOS app activity. Marketers may find it useful to segment unique visitors to obtain additional user insights (Google, n.d.).

(Credit: Google)

And because Google Analytics uses the same age, gender and interest categories in its reports as in AdWords, marketers can target ads based on intelligence drawn from analytics reports (Google, n.d.). For example, if a business sells kitchen gadgets and Google Analytics shows higher conversion rates for unique visitors 35-44 years old than 25-34 year-olds, marketing might shift its efforts toward advertising to this group.

Besides measuring volumes of traffic from individual users, the unique-visitor metric is also the denominator in the popular Conversion Rate calculation (Kaushik recommends employing unique visitors, not visits, in this formula. As of the writing of his book, Google Analytics uses visits by default.)

Although unique-visitor data might sometimes be overshadowed by other metrics (characterization, engagement, conversion), it is a dependable workhorse in the marketer’s analytics stable.

References

Google. (n.d.). About demographics and interests. Google Analytics Help. Retrieved from https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/2799357?hl=en

Kaushik, A. (2010). Web analytics 2.0: The art of online accountability & science of customer centricity. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
       

Schwartz, B. (2014, April 17). Google Analytics: Visits now sessions & unique visitors now users. Search Engine Roundtable. Retrieved from https://www.seroundtable.com/google-analytics-sessions-users-18424.html

Web Analytics Association. (2008, September 22). Web analytics definitions. Retrieved from: http://www.digitalanalyticsassociation.org/Files/PDF_standards/WebAnalyticsDefinitions.pdf

Wright, B. (2015, November 30). Target’s website crashes over ‘high traffic’ during Cyber Monday. International Business Times. Retrieved from http://www.ibtimes.com/targets-website-crashes-over-high-traffic-during-cyber-monday-2204194